Real Raw News - Getting The Real Story

So, you might have come across stories from something called "real raw news," perhaps seeing them shared online or hearing about them. These articles, you know, often carry a byline that says "michael baxter," which is actually a name used to keep things private. It's almost like a pen name for the person putting these pieces out there for everyone to read. This particular website has, in a way, put out quite a few stories, more than 150 of them, and a lot of these pieces have really spread far and wide across social media platforms and other places on the internet.

Apparently, this "real raw news" project got its start back in April of 2020, with someone operating under that "michael baxter" name. The website then started putting out articles for people to see that December, which is just a little while after it was created. It's interesting to think about how quickly content can begin to appear once a site is up and running, you know, especially when it's aiming to share particular kinds of information.

Then, in 2021, a group called PolitiFact looked into things and found that the person behind "baxter" had, as a matter of fact, run at least three other websites and connected YouTube channels before this one. These earlier ventures, it seems, were focused on promoting ideas that some would call conspiracy theories, covering topics like visitations from beings from other planets and a made-up planet called Nibiru. This background, you see, helps give a bit more context to the kind of content that "real raw news" tends to put out.

• Walgreens Open
• Anguilla Four Seasons
• Greenway Dodge
• Full Source
• Villas Tacos Los Angeles

Table of Contents

• Who is the Person Behind Real Raw News?
  • The Background of Michael Baxter
• What Exactly is Real Raw News?
  • The Kinds of Stories Real Raw News Shares
• How Do Real Raw News Stories Get Around?
  • Where Else Do You Find Real Raw News Content?
• Has Real Raw News Been Looked Into?
  • What Did PolitiFact Find About Real Raw News?
• Some Specific Claims from Real Raw News
  • Reports on Government Changes
  • Claims About High-Profile Arrests and Outcomes

Who is the Person Behind Real Raw News?

So, a lot of folks might wonder about the individual who is responsible for the "real raw news" website and all the content it puts out. It's a pretty common thing to want to know the source of information, especially when it's shared so widely. The website itself states that it is owned and run by someone named Michael Baxter. This person, as a matter of fact, is described as having been a journalist for more traditional news outlets in the past, and also, it seems, spent some time teaching English. This background, you know, could suggest a certain way with words, perhaps, given those experiences.

The Background of Michael Baxter

As we touched on, the name "michael baxter" is a pseudonym, a chosen name for the public face of "real raw news." The text mentions that if you wanted to get in touch with this individual, you could apparently send an email to michael@realrawnews.com. It also says, quite frankly, that any emails that seem "trollish" are deleted without even being read. That's a pretty clear boundary, you know, for managing communications. The story of "real raw news" is, in some respects, tied to this individual and their past projects.

You see, PolitiFact, when they looked into things in 2021, found that this "baxter" character had previously managed at least three other websites and their linked YouTube channels. These earlier ventures, it turns out, were involved in promoting ideas that some would consider conspiracy theories. For instance, they talked about things like visits from beings from other planets and a made-up planet called Nibiru. This history, then, gives a bit more color to the kind of material that "real raw news" tends to put out for its readers.

• Aventura Hospital
• St Louis Aquarium At Union Station Tickets
• Butternut Ski Great Barrington
• Bell In Hand
• Milwaukee Art Museum Prices

It's interesting to consider that a person with a background in traditional journalism and teaching would then go on to create content that often touches on these sorts of topics. This shift, you know, from what might be seen as more conventional roles to this kind of online publishing, is something that, in a way, makes you curious about the motivations behind it. The way the site presents itself, and the stories it chooses to tell, are, as a matter of fact, very much linked to this individual's approach to information sharing.

What Exactly is Real Raw News?

So, when you think about "real raw news," it's probably helpful to understand what kind of website it is. The information tells us that it's a political news site that, you know, is meant to be satirical. But it also frequently puts out ideas that are, in a way, conspiracy theories. This combination of satire and conspiracy theories is, in some respects, a key characteristic of the site's content. It's not just straightforward news, that's for sure, and it has a particular bent to its storytelling.

The site, for instance, publishes stories that are described as being very imaginative, almost fantastical. These stories, as a matter of fact, are also said to be demonstrably false. They often talk about things like people being arrested, then having trials, and even going through hangings and executions. These are, you know, very dramatic sorts of claims that appear on the site, and they often involve well-known figures or situations. It's a rather specific kind of narrative that "real raw news" tends to put forward.

It's also worth noting that the way satire is used can, in a way, be a bit tricky. Media sources have pointed out that satire, when it's not clearly marked, can sometimes be packaged in a way that makes it seem like a genuine news story. This can, in some respects, be quite misleading. So, while "real raw news" is labeled as satirical, the actual effect of its stories on readers is something that comes into question, especially when they circulate widely without that clear distinction being made.

The Kinds of Stories Real Raw News Shares

The stories you find on "real raw news" are, basically, quite unique in their content. They often describe very dramatic events that, it seems, have not actually happened in the real world. For example, there are stories about high-profile individuals being taken into custody, facing legal proceedings, and even being put to death. These narratives, you know, are presented with a certain level of detail, but they are, in fact, made up. This approach to storytelling is what gives the site its particular flavor.

The site's own "About Us" section, on the other hand, says that "real raw news" tries to shed light on topics that are often overlooked by other sources. It claims to be dedicated to delivering "real raw news" by mixing "unwavering factual reliability" with a deep promise to be open and truthful. This is, in some respects, how the site describes its own mission. However, as we'll discuss, external reviews have often found a different picture when it comes to the factual basis of these stories, which is, you know, a bit of a contrast.

How Do Real Raw News Stories Get Around?

It's quite interesting how widely the stories from "real raw news" actually spread once they are published. The text points out that many of the more than 150 stories the website has put out have circulated very broadly across social media platforms. You know, these days, content can really take off quickly online, and it seems that the articles from "real raw news" are no exception to that. They find their way to a lot of people's screens, which is, in a way, a testament to how information travels in the digital space.

Where Else Do You Find Real Raw News Content?

Beyond the "real raw news" website itself, it seems that these stories don't just stay in one place. Multiple other websites and blogs, for instance, also take these stories and publish them again. Sites like "Before It's News" and "Trust the Q" are mentioned as examples of places that republish content from "real raw news." This means that even if you don't go directly to the original site, you might still come across these articles through other sources, which, you know, expands their reach even further.

This practice of republishing, in a way, helps these stories gain even more visibility. It's almost like a ripple effect, where one site puts out the information, and then others pick it up and share it with their own audiences. This can, in some respects, make it harder for readers to tell where the information originally came from or to verify its accuracy, especially if they are just seeing it pop up on a site they usually visit. It's a rather common occurrence in the online world, where content can travel far and wide.

Has Real Raw News Been Looked Into?

Given the nature of the stories published by "real raw news," it's not surprising that external groups have taken a closer look at the website and its content. When information circulates widely and makes significant claims, it often draws the attention of organizations that specialize in checking facts and verifying stories. This kind of scrutiny is, in a way, a natural part of the information landscape today, especially with so much content being shared online.

What Did PolitiFact Find About Real Raw News?

PolitiFact, a well-known fact-checking organization, has, as a matter of fact, conducted investigations into "real raw news." In 2021, they found that the person using the "michael baxter" pseudonym had previously operated at least three other websites and connected YouTube channels. These earlier projects, it turns out, were involved in promoting conspiracy theories, covering subjects like visitations from beings from other planets and a made-up planet called Nibiru. This background, you know, gives a bit of a hint about the kind of content that might appear on "real raw news."

Then, on September 24, 2021, PolitiFact published a detailed investigation specifically looking into "real raw news." This particular report focused on the site's claims about "hangings, guillotines, and Gitmo." It went behind what it called the "sensational (and fabricated) headlines" of "real raw news." This means that the investigation looked at the dramatic claims the site was making and, in a way, found them to be untrue. It's a rather direct assessment of the content that "real raw news" puts out for its readers.

The distinction between genuine news satire and sites that deliberately spread hoaxes is also something that PolitiFact and others point out. Fake news sites, you see, intentionally publish false information and made-up stories to get more people to visit their websites, often fueled by sharing on social media. These sites are different from news satire, which is usually meant to be funny and clearly humorous. The problem is that fake news sites can mislead people and sometimes even make money from readers who might be, you know, a bit too trusting. While some of these sites might look like they're connected to other news sources, they are, in fact, examples of how misinformation can spread, and this is a key point when considering "real raw news."

Some Specific Claims from Real Raw News

The "real raw news" website often publishes stories that make rather bold claims about events, particularly those involving political figures and government agencies. These stories are, basically, presented as if they are factual reports, but they often contain elements that are, in some respects, quite extraordinary. It's almost like a different version of reality is being described, with specific details that, you know, are meant to sound very convincing to the reader.

Reports on Government Changes

One example of a story from "real raw news" involves former President Trump. The site reported that President Trump told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that he planned to cut 1,200 extra jobs at the Central Intelligence Agency over the next few years. This was supposedly to help reduce the federal budget. However, "real raw news" also claimed that, according to "reliable sources," Trump had already, as a matter of fact, significantly reduced the CIA and other government agencies, but for reasons other than just cutting unnecessary spending and too much bureaucracy. This suggests a deeper, perhaps hidden, motive behind the actions, which is, you know, a typical theme for some of their stories.

Another story from "real raw news" talked about the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg. The site claimed that this division was ready to help the National Guard and United States Marines in Los Angeles. This assistance would supposedly be needed if unruly individuals kept stopping the government's efforts to deport people who are in the country without permission. "Real raw news" reported that it had learned this information. The story also mentioned that Trump, described as a very clever planner, met with the division's leader, Major General James Work, after speaking. These sorts of details, you see, are often included to make the stories seem more credible, even if the underlying claims are not, in fact, true.

Claims About High-Profile Arrests and Outcomes

The website also frequently reports on the arrests and alleged executions of various figures, often described as part of a "deep state" or as opponents of former President Trump. For example, "real raw news" reported that Jack Smith, who was called a "deep stater" and someone who disliked Trump, was put to death at Guantanamo Bay. This supposedly happened on a Friday after he was found guilty of treason at a military court on November 4. As the site had reported earlier, individuals referred to as "white hats" had arrested Smith in July. This was when a judge, Aileen Canon, had dismissed what were called "bogus federal charges" that the Department of Injustice had brought against Trump. Smith, described as stubborn, was put in restraints and then flown to Gitmo, which is, you know, a very dramatic sequence of events to claim.

In another story, "real raw news" claimed that two long-time government workers and members of the National Security Council were arrested by "white hats" on a Monday. This happened after President Trump's team, during his transition, apparently raised concerns that these two individuals planned to trick Trump by giving him incorrect intelligence reports. A source from General Eric M. Smith's office supposedly told "real raw news" about this. These stories, you see, often paint a picture of a hidden struggle within government, with certain groups working against others, which is, in a way, a common thread in their narratives.

The site also reported on the alleged execution of Deep State Judge Juan Merchan at Guantanamo Bay. This story claimed he was put to death without first having a military court proceeding, making him the latest "cabalist" to face such a fate. On December 23, Merchan was supposedly taken from his cell and brought before a group of military leaders who had gathered at the gallows to say goodbye. As reported previously, investigators from the U.S. Navy's legal department had arrested Merchan at his home in the Astoria neighborhood. These claims, you know, are very specific and, in some respects, quite shocking, if they were true.

Finally, "real raw news" also reported that Alejandro Mayorkas, who was the Secretary of Homeland Security and described as "disgraced," became the second "deep stater" to be executed without a military court. A source from the military's legal office supposedly told "real raw news" this information. The story also mentioned that, as reported that week, the U.S. Navy's legal department and office of military commissions had seen a significant change in leadership. Its new head, Vice Admiral Christopher French, and his immediate team, were mentioned. These sorts of details are, as a matter of fact, often included to lend an air of authenticity to these very unusual claims.